From 293411c3426ff52f2ff1a753044304768f30bc34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Iliya Krempeaux Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:11:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] small-net debates --- index.xhtml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) diff --git a/index.xhtml b/index.xhtml index 5f2ae26..f8e33f4 100644 --- a/index.xhtml +++ b/index.xhtml @@ -411,6 +411,57 @@ +
+

Debates

+

+ There are several debates within the small-net communities: +

+
+

Encryption

+
    +
  • should encryption of communications be mandatory
  • +
  • should encryption of communications be optional
  • +
  • should encryption of communications be prohibited
  • +
+
+
+

Media

+
    +
  • should it be text only (for some definition of "text")
  • +
  • should audio be supported
  • +
  • should embedded audio be supported
  • +
  • should images be supported
  • +
  • should embedded images be supported
  • +
  • should video be supported
  • +
  • should embedded videos be supported
  • +
+
+
+

Old Computers

+
    +
  • should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features that the vintage VT05 computer-terminal had — i.e., no blinking, no bolding, no underlining, no reverse text, but also no lower-case letters
  • +
  • should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features of the ASCII data format
  • +
  • should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features that are renderable on most of the popular modern computer-terminal-emulators
  • +
  • should we embrace the "best" of old computers without being restricted by (all) their limitations
  • +
+
+
+

Rich Formatting

+
    +
  • is 'bolding' a type of punctuation or styling
  • +
  • is 'italicizing' a type of punctuation or styling
  • +
  • is 'underlining' a type of punctuation or styling
  • +
+
+
+

The Web

+
    +
  • should a small-net protocol be intentionally incompatible with the Web — except maybe over bridge-proxies
  • +
  • should a small-net protocol be at least minimally compatible with the Web — to make it so people have a "gentle" path to using any small-net
  • +
  • should a small-net HTML make use of Web-components
  • +
+
+