reiver
/
reiver-smallnet
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

small-net debates

master
Charles Iliya Krempeaux 2024-01-02 09:11:58 -08:00
parent b0e3ff7e26
commit 293411c342
1 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
index.xhtml
View File

@ -411,6 +411,57 @@
</ul> </ul>
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
<section>
<h2>Debates</h2>
<p>
There are several debates within the <strong>small-net</strong> communities:
</p>
<section>
<h3>Encryption</h3>
<ul>
<li>should encryption of communications be mandatory</li>
<li>should encryption of communications be optional</li>
<li>should encryption of communications be prohibited</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section>
<h3>Media</h3>
<ul>
<li>should it be text only (for some definition of "text")</li>
<li>should audio be supported</li>
<li>should embedded audio be supported</li>
<li>should images be supported</li>
<li>should embedded images be supported</li>
<li>should video be supported</li>
<li>should embedded videos be supported</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section>
<h3>Old Computers</h3>
<ul>
<li>should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features that the vintage VT05 computer-terminal had — i.e., no blinking, no bolding, no underlining, no reverse text, but also <strong>no lower-case letters</strong></li>
<li>should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features of the ASCII data format</li>
<li>should the default "text" format of a small-net protocol only support the features that are renderable on most of the popular modern computer-terminal-emulators</li>
<li>should we embrace the "best" of old computers without being restricted by (all) their limitations</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section>
<h3>Rich Formatting</h3>
<ul>
<li>is 'bolding' a type of punctuation or styling</li>
<li>is 'italicizing' a type of punctuation or styling</li>
<li>is 'underlining' a type of punctuation or styling</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section>
<h3>The Web</h3>
<ul>
<li>should a small-net protocol be intentionally incompatible with the Web — except maybe over bridge-proxies</li>
<li>should a small-net protocol be at least minimally compatible with the Web — to make it so people have a "gentle" path to using any small-net</li>
<li>should a small-net HTML make use of Web-components</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
</article> </article>
</main> </main>
</body> </body>